![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image002.jpg)
J. Cent. South Univ. (2020) 27: 824-841
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-020-4334-x
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image004.jpg)
Rotational nanofluids for oxytactic microorganisms with convective boundary conditions using bivariate spectral quasi-linearization method
Mlamuli DHLAMINI1, Hiranmoy MONDAL2, Precious SIBANDA1, Sandile MOTSA1, 3
1. School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of Kwa Zulu-Natal, Private Bag X01,Scottsvile, Pietermaritzburg-3209, South Africa;
2. Department of Mathematics, Brainware University, 398 Ramkrishnapur Road, Barasat, North 24 Parganas,Kolkata-700125, India;
3. Department of Mathematics, University of Swaziland, Private Bag 4, Kwaluseni, Swaziland
Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract: In this study, we considered the three-dimensional flow of a rotating viscous, incompressible electrically conducting nanofluid with oxytactic microorganisms and an insulated plate floating in the fluid. Three scenarios were considered in this study. The first case is when the fluid drags the plate, the second is when the plate drags the fluid and the third is when the plate floats on the fluid at the same velocity. The denser microorganisms create the bioconvection as they swim to the top following an oxygen gradient within the fluid. The velocity ratio parameter plays a key role in the dynamics for this flow. Varying the parameter below and above a critical value alters the dynamics of the flow. The Hartmann number, buoyancy ratio and radiation parameter have a reverse effect on the secondary velocity for values of the velocity ratio above and below the critical value. The Hall parameter on the other hand has a reverse effect on the primary velocity for values of velocity ratio above and below the critical value. The bioconvection Rayleigh number decreases the primary velocity. The secondary velocity increases with increasing values of the bioconvection Rayleigh number and is positive for velocity ratio values below 0.5. For values of the velocity ratio parameter above 0.5, the secondary velocity is negative for small values of bioconvection Rayleigh number and as the values increase, the flow is reversed and becomes positive.
Key words: bioconvection; oxytactic microorganisms; velocity ratio; rotational nanofluid; bivariate spectral quasilinearization method (BSQLM)
Cite this article as: Mlamuli DHLAMINI, Hiranmoy MONDAL, Precious SIBANDA, Sandile MOTSA. Rotational nanofluids for oxytactic microorganisms with convective boundary conditions using bivariate spectral quasi- linearization method [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(3): 824-841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11771-020-4334-x.
1 Introduction
The study of boundary layer flow has received a lot of attention since the ground-breaking study by Lewig Prandtl in 1904. Many flows of interest occur within a boundary layer, and often in conjunction with heat and/or mass transport.
In many industrial processes such as the cooling of electronic devices, solar energy collectors, thermal insulation, underground nuclear disposal and chemical processes, heat transfer enhancement is of paramount importance [1]. Of late nanofluids have been identified as the best choice of fluids for heat transfer processes. The term nanofluid refers to a colloidal suspension of submicronic solid particles. A typical nanoparticle is a stable metal (Al, Cu, Ag, Au, Fe), oxide (Al2O3,CuO, TiO2, SiO2), carbide (SiC), nitrate (AlN, SiN), or non-metal (graphite) with sizes ranging from 1 to 100 nm. The base fluid normally is a conductive fluid, such as water, ethylene glycol, oil, polymer or bio-fluids [1]. The flow of a rotating fluid is encountered in geothermal flows [2]. It is also the reason for the secular variations in geomagnetic fields [3]. In rotating fluids, the Coriolis force is more prominent than the viscous and inertial forces[2]. The viscous forces are balanced by the Coriolis forces instead of the inertial forces. According to HIDE [4, 5], in the study of geophysical flows a key parameter is the Rossby number. The influence of the rotation is said to be weak if the Rossby number is significantly less than unity, and dominant if the Rossby number is significantly larger than unity. The study of rotational viscous fluids sheds some light on the body forces that act on particles immersed in the fluid. This area of study continues to receive considerable attention because of a variety of industrial applications [6]. The motion of rigid particles or drops in rotating fluids is encountered in a number of industrial processes such as in the manufacturing of hallow shells, separation of minerals, extraction of proteins and in waste water treatment [7-11].
Nanofluid bioconvection gives rise to spontaneous pattern formation and density stratification. This is a phenomenon that occurs when instability is induced by the interaction of the swimming of denser self-propelled microorganisms, nanoparticles and buoyancy forces [1, 12]. Bioconvection arises in biological systems, biotechnology such as the mass transport enhancement in microscale mixing and the synthesis of biosensors [13]. Some of microorganisms that normally give rise to bioconvection include gravitaxis, gyrotaxis and oxytaxis. This study considers the movement of oxytactic microorganisms. These are bacteria that consume oxygen such as Bacillussubtilis. They swim up the oxygen concentration gradient. KUZNETSOV [12] considered a novel nanofluid with oxytactic microorganisms. The bacteria are oxygen consumers and swim towards the top region when this is exposed to the elements. LEE et al [14] investigated falling bacteria plumes caused by bioconvection. Their study was an extension of work in Ref. [15]. In both studies the falling plumes are attributed to the instability of bacteria-rich boundary layer close to the surface that is denser than the rest of the fluid. The falling plumes transport bacteria and oxygen from the upper boundary layer to the lower region of the chamber, which is depleted of both bacteria and oxygen. The use of microorganisms in delivering oxygen is encountered in industrial processes such as aerobic fermentation [16]. Other uses of microorganisms in industrial processes are encountered in bio-reactors [17].
Bioconvection has been studied by several researchers [18-25]. The current study incorporates a rotational electrically conducting nanofluid with an applied magnetic field to the study of bioconvection induced by oxytactic microorganisms. We also consider the impact of varying the velocity of the plate relative to the fluid velocity and the influence of fluid and flow parameters.
2 Mathematical analysis
The physical model and coordinate system is given in Figure 1, where x, y and z are Cartesian coordinates and u, v and w are the velocity components in the corresponding directions. We consider an insulated flat plate which coincides with the plane z=0. The plate moves with a velocity U1 in the x direction in a viscous, incompressible, electrically conducting nanofluid that is rotating with constant angular velocity Ω about the x-axis containing oxytaxis microorganisms. There is also a uniform free stream velocity U2 parallel to the x-axis. A magnetic field B0 is applied along the z-axis. The temperature and concentration of nanoparticles and free stream microorganisms are kept at constant Tw, Cw and nw while in the free stream these are assumed to be T∞, C∞ and n∞ respectively. The effects of the Coriolis force and Hall currents give rise to a force in the y-direction, which induces cross flow [2]. The set of equations modeling the flow in a rotating frame of reference with Maxwells electromagnetic equations are given by
(1)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image013.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image015.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image017.gif)
(2)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image023.gif)
(3)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image027.gif)
(4)
(5)
(6)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image039.jpg)
Figure 1 Flow configuration and coordinate system
The boundary conditions for Eqs. (1)-(6) are given in form:
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image041.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image043.gif)
(7)
where ρ is the density of the base fluid; υ is the kinematic viscosity; σ is the electrical conductivity of the fluid; N is the Hall parameter; g is the gravitational acceleration; β is the volumetric coefficient of expansion for the fluid; ρp is the density of the nanoparticles; ρf is the density of the nanofluid; γ is the average volume of the microorganisms; ρm is the density of microorganisms; αm is the thermal diffusivity coefficient for microorganisms; τ is the ratio of heat capacitance of nanoparticles to the base fluid; DB is the Brownian diffusion coefficient; DT is the thermophoretic diffusion coefficient; σ* is Stephan Boltzman constant; Cp is the specific heat capacity of the fluid at constant pressure; b is the chemotaxis constant; Wc is the maximum cell swimming speed (bWc is assumed to be constant); Dn is the microorganism diffusivity; kf is the thermal conductivity of the solid and hf is the convective heat transfer coefficient.
Far from the surface, the pressure gradients in the x and y directions, -ρ-1ρx and -ρ-1ρy, must balance the Lorentz and Coriolis forces [2] and are given by the relations:
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image049.gif)
(8)
In this study we excluded the effect of viscous dissipation and Joule heating. Viscous dissipation is the heat generated in a fluid due to the frictional forces between fluid layers as they slide over each other. Joule/Ohmic heating is the heat generated due to resistance of a current as it passes through a medium. The effect of both viscous and Joule heating has been studied extensively and is well documented in Refs. [26, 27]. Since we assumed that we have a heated plate, we therefore assume that it is the major contributor of heat and all other heat sources are negligible.
3 Transformation of equations
The following variables are used to transform the system given by Eqs. (1)-(6),
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image053.gif)
(9)
The velocity components
and
are given as
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image063.gif)
(10)
On using Eqs. (8)-(9), Eqs. (2) - (6) and the boundary conditions (7) are transformed into the following boundary value problem:
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image069.gif)
(11)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image073.gif)
(12)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image079.gif)
(13)
(14)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image089.gif)
(15)
where the prime denotes differentiation with respect to η. The corresponding boundary conditions (7) are transformed as
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image093.gif)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
The parameters in the above differential equations and associated boundary conditions are defined as
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image113.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image115.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image117.gif)
(21)
where M is the modified Hartmann number; Gr is the Grashof number; Nr is the buoyancy ratio; Rb is the bioconvection Rayleigh number; Pr is the Prandtl number; S is the velocity ratio; Ra is the radiation parameter; Nb is the Brownian motion parameter; Nt is thermophoresis parameter; Pb is the bioconvection Peclet number; τ0 is the constant microorganisms concentration difference parameter; Sc is the Schmidt number; Sb is the bioconvection Schmidt number; Rex is the Reynolds number; Bi is the Biot number.
4 Momentum, heat and mass transfer coefficients
The parameters that are of interest are the skin friction coefficient, Cf, which measures the shear stress on the surface, the Nusselt number, Nu, which is the ratio of convective to conductive heat transfer across (normal to) the boundary, the Sherwood number, Sh, which is the ratio of the convective mass transfer to the rate of diffusive mass transport and the local density number of the motile microorganisms, Nn, which is the ratio of the convective microorganism transfer to the rate of diffusive microorganism transport.
The local skin friction coefficients in the x and y directions are given as
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image123.gif)
(22)
The local Nusselt number, local Sherwood number and local density number of the motile microorganisms are given by
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image127.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image129.gif)
(23)
where
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image133.gif)
.
5 Numerical solution using bivariate spectral quasi-linearization method
The two-variable nonlinear boundary value problem given by Eqs. (11)-(15) together with the boundary conditions Eqs. (16)-(20) was solved numerically using the bivariate spectral quasilinearization method (BSQLM). The choice of using a spectral-based method is that they require less grid points yet giving accurate results and take less computational time compared to other methods [28, 29]. The flow domain and time interval given by η
[0, Lx] and ξ
[0, Lt] are transformed to x
[-1, 1] and t
[-1, 1] using the linear transformations η
Lx(x+1)/2 and ξ
Lt(x+1)/2 respectively. The solution is approximated using Lagrange interpolation polynomial of the form:
(24)
where u(x, t) is interpolated at selected grid points both in the x and t directions. The grid points are defined as
(25)
The functions Li(x) are the Lagrange cardinal polynomials given by
(26)
where
(27)
Lj(t) is also defined in a similar manner. We begin by defining the functions F, G, Θ, Φ and X for Eqs. (10)-(14) as
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image165.gif)
(28)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image171.gif)
(29)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image175.gif)
(30)
(31)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image185.gif)
(32)
We construct the solution using the iterative process given by Eqs. (28)-(32):
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image189.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image191.gif)
(33)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image195.gif)
(34)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image201.gif)
(35)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image207.gif)
(36)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image211.gif)
(37)
subjected to the boundary conditions
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image215.gif)
(38)
(39)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image223.gif)
(40)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image227.gif)
(41)
(42)
The coefficients in Eqs. (33)- (37) are given as
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image235.gif)
;
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image239.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image241.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image243.gif)
(43)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image247.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image249.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image251.gif)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image253.gif)
The initial guess functions are selected in such a way that they satisfy the boundary conditions at ξ=0. These are chosen as
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image257.gif)
(44)
For a detailed explanation on how the resulting matrices and corresponding boundary conditions are implemented on a MATLAB code, one can refer to work by MOTSA et al [28, 29].
Table 1 gives parameter values that were used in similar studies.
We validate the accuracy and convergence of our numerical scheme by performing an error analysis. We plot the norm of residual errors in the variables against the number of iterations. The norm of residual errors for all the variables was less than 10-10 after 8 iterations. This shows that the BSQLM is an appropriate scheme for solving the resulting boundary value problem. Figure 2 shows the norm of residual errors for different variables at different number of iterations.
Table 1 Parameter values and their source
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image261.jpg)
6 Discussion and results
In this section we discuss the results of our findings. We investigate the impact that certain key parameters have on the physical, thermal and concentration properties of the flow. We analyze the variation of the local skin friction coefficient, Nusselt number, Sherwood number and density of motile microorganisms in Table 2.
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image263.jpg)
Figure 2 Norm of residual at different iterations
We investigate the influence of the velocity ratio parameter S in Figure 3. It gives the relative velocity of the plate to the velocity of the fluid. A value of zero corresponds to the case of a fluid flowing past a stationary plate. A value of 1 corresponds to the case of a plate moving in a stationary fluid. 0
Table 2 Variation of local skin friction coefficient
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image265.jpg)
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image267.jpg)
Figure 3 Influence of velocity ratio:
We analyze the effect of the Hartmann number on the fluid’s velocity in Figure 4. The Hartmann number is a dimensionless parameter defined as the ratio of electromagnetic force to the viscous force. An increase in the Hartmann number for the case when the plate is moving relatively faster than the fluid (S>0.5) results in a decrease in the fluid’s primary velocity in the boundary layer. This is due to an increase in the Lorentz force that tends to oppose the flow resulting in a frictional drag [30]. An opposite phenomenon is observed for the case when S<0.5, that is, an increase in the Hartmann number results in a velocity increase for the primary flow close to the surface. The Hartmann number causes decrease in the secondary velocity; however, the flow is reversed for values above and below the critical value of 0.5.
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image269.jpg)
Figure 4 Effect of Hartmann number on fluid’s velocity:
The influence of the Hartmann number on other parameters is depicted in Figure 5. Our results for the case when S>0.5 are consistent with results found in Ref. [1] that it causes an increase in the temperature chemical species concentration and motile microorganisms. A reverse effect is observed for values of S<0.5.
The buoyancy ratio parameter Nr is analyzed in Figure 6. The buoyancy ratio parameter measures the influence of free and forced convection [31]. In free convection the flow is due to a temperature gradient whereas in forced convection an external device like a pump is used to generate or maintain the flow. It is noticed that for S>0.5 an increase in the buoyancy ratio parameter results in a decrease in both the primary and secondary velocities. An increase in the temperature, chemical species and microorganism concentration is also associated with increasing the buoyancy ratio parameter, results consistent with results in Ref. [32]. In fact, the increase in the chemical species volume fraction is attributed to decrease in the velocity of the fluid [20]. All other parameters behave in a similar manner for values of S<0.5 except the secondary velocity that is in the reverse direction.
The impact of Hall parameter N is assessed in Figure 7. The Hall effect is the production of a voltage difference across an electrical conductor to an applied magnetic field. The Hall parameter is defined to be the ratio of induced electrical field to the applied magnetic field. An increase in the Hall parameter results in an increase in the velocity profile [33, 34]. This is attributed to the fact that the magnetic field on the velocity damping reduces as the Hall parameter is increased. However, there are some studies that reported results are contrary to this [2, 35]. Our results show an increase in the velocity profile for the secondary flow and the primary velocity for the case when S<0.5. When S>0.5, the primary velocity decreases with increasing values of the Hall parameter. The phenomenon responsible for the observed trend is not fully understood.
The impact of thermal radiation is analyzed in Figure 8. The primary velocity increases with increasing values of the thermal radiation parameter for all values of S. This is because an increase in the thermal radiation parameter leads to conduction dominating absorption radiation, resulting in an increase in buoyancy force [33]. Also, an increase in thermal radiation parameter leads to an increase in the fluid’s temperature, causing a decrease of the fluid’s viscosity making it easier to flow. The secondary velocity increases with increasing values of thermal radiation for values of S>0.5. The result is consistent with result in Ref. [33]. However, for S<0.5, our results show a decrease in the secondary velocity for increasing values of radiation parameter in the reverse direction. Temperature, concentration of chemical species and microorganisms are plotted for the case when S=0.75. There are no differences in the graph of these variables for different values of S. From Figure 8 we notice that increasing the radiation parameter results in an increase in the temperature of the fluid. This is because increasing the radiation parameter increases the Rossland diffusion [36], resulting in an increase in the fluid’s temperature. Similar results are reported in Refs. [33, 37]. An increase in the radiation parameter results in an initial decrease of the chemical species. Far from the surface, the concentration of the chemical species increases with increasing values of thermal radiation. REDDY et al [37] also reported similar results; however, no physical explanation was given about the phenomenon of primary velocity for S=0.25. We postulate that this phenomenon is associated with primary velocity, secondary velocity for S=0.25 in the primary velocity profile for the thermal radiation parameter. An increase in the primary velocity in the boundary layer results in the chemical species being carried outside the boundary layer and deposited outside the boundary layer leading to the observed phenomenon. The concentration of the microorganisms decreases with increasing values of thermal radiation parameter.
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image271.jpg)
Figure 5 Effect of Hartmann number:
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image273.jpg)
Figure 6 Effect of buoyancy ratio:
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image275.jpg)
Figure 7 Effect of Hall parameter:
We analyze the influence of the bioconvective Rayleigh number Rb in Figure 9. The Rayleigh number is defined as a dimensionless number that is associated with buoyancy-driven flow. Below a certain critical value, heat transfer is primarily due to conduction and above that critical value it is due to convection. The primary velocity decreases with increasing values of Rayleigh number for all values of S. Temperature, concentration of chemical species and microorganisms increase with increasing value of Rayleigh number. Similar results were obtained in Ref. [19]. Secondary velocity on the other hand increases with increasing values of Rayleigh number and is positive for S<0.5. For values of S>0.5, the secondary velocity decreases for small values of Rayleigh number and the flow is negative. For large values of Rayleigh number, the flow becomes positive and increases with increasing values of Rayleigh number.
In Figure 10, we analyze the impact of Brownian motion parameter Nb and the thermophoretic parameter Nt on the concentration of chemical species. Brownian motion is the random ‘indeterminate’ movement of microscopic particles in a fluid due to bombardment by molecules of surrounding medium or fluid. Our results show that an increase in the Brownian motion parameter leads to a decrease in the chemical species concentration in the boundary layer. Similar results for the parameter are reported in Refs. [1, 38, 39]. This is attributed to the fact that increasing the Brownian motion parameter leads to more solute being ‘pushed’ out of the boundary layer which is relatively ‘thin’ compared to the rest of the fluid. Thermophoresis, sometimes known as thermo-migration or thermo-diffusion is a phenomenon where microscopic molecules in a fluid exhibit a response to a force that is due to a temperature gradient. The force acts in the direction of a hot region to a cold region. An increase in the thermophoresis parameter leads to an increase in the concentration of chemical species. The result is in agreement with result in Ref. [38] that the fast flow from the stretching sheet carries the nanoparticles leading to an increase in the mass volume fraction boundary layer thickness. Similar conclusions about the parameter were also made in Refs. [1, 40].
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image277.jpg)
Figure 8 Effect of thermal radiation:
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image279.jpg)
Figure 9 Effect of bioconvective Rayleigh number:
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image281.jpg)
Figure 10 Effect of Brownian motion parameter Nb (a) and thermophoretic parameter Nt (b) on chemical species concentration
In Figure 11, we review the effect of the Schmdit number Sc on chemical species concentration, bioconvection Schmdit number and bioconvection Peclet number on microorganisms. An increase in the Schmdit number leads to a decrease in the chemical species concentration in the boundary layer. Similar results were obtained in Ref. [41]. Similarly, an increase in the bioconvection Peclet number causes a decrease in the microorganism’s concentration in the boundary layer. An increase in the bioconvection Peclet number increases the microorganism’s concentration in the boundary layer. The bioconvection Peclet number is defined as the ratio of swimming microorganisms to the speed of the bulk fluid motion. The bioconvection Peclet number is less than unity if the fluid speed is faster than the microorganisms and greater than unity otherwise. It is equal to unity if the fluid speed equals the speed of microorganisms. Increase in the bioconvection Peclet number increases the motile microorganisms in the boundary layer [42, 43]. This is so because increasing the Peclet number increases the advective transport rate compared to the rate of diffusion. This attracts microorganisms near the boundary and as a result, the microorganisms flux increases. An increase in the bioconvection Schmdit number leads to a decrease in the concentration of microorganisms in the boundary layer. A result similar to ones is reported in Ref. [43].
![](/web/fileinfo/upload/magazine/12769/320910/image283.jpg)
Figure 11 Effect of Schmdit number on chemical species concentration (a), bioconvective Schmidt number (b) and bioconvective Peclet number (c) on microorganism’s concentration
7 Conclusions
In this article we formulated and analyzed a model for a three-dimensional viscous incompressible rotational flow of an electrically conducting fluid with oxytactic microorganisms. The velocity ratio parameter is identified as a key parameter in this study. It has the potential of changing the dynamics of the flow. For values of this parameter above or below a critical value of 0.5 the flow reverses. In some cases, it alters the effect of other parameters, such as the Hartmann number on primary velocity. It is not clear at this point why/how these changes occur. Some of the key findings are:
The thermal radiation parameter increases the primary velocity while decreasing the secondary velocity for S<0.5. For S>0.5, there is a reverse effect for both the primary and secondary velocities.
Increasing the velocity ratio increases the temperature, concentration of chemical species and microorganisms.
Increasing the bioconvection Peclet number increases the microorganism’s concentration in the boundary layer.
Increasing the Schmidt number and bioconvection Schmidt number leads to a decrease in the chemical species concentration and microorganisms, respectively.
References
[1] MUTUKU W N, MAKINDE O D. Hydromagnetic bioconvection of nanofluid over a permeable vertical plate due to gyrotactic microorganisms [J]. Computers & Fluids, 2014, 95: 88-97.
[2] TAKHAR H S, CHAMKHA A J, NATH G. MHD flow over a moving plate in a rotating fluid with magnetic field, hall currents and free stream velocity [J]. International Journal of Engineering Science, 2002, 40(13): 1511-1527.
[3] HIDE R, ROBERTS P. The origin of the main geomagnetic field [J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 1961, 4: 27-98.
[4] HIDE R. Free hydromagnetic oscillations of the earth's core and the theory of the geomagnetic secular variation [J]. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Series A, 1966, 259 (1107): 615-647.
[5] HIDE R. Magnetohydrodynamics of rotating fluids: A summary of some recent work [J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1971, 12: 380-383.
[6] BUSH J, STONE H. Particle motion in rotating viscous fluids: Historical survey and recent developments [J]. J Fluid Mech, 1994, 282(1): 337-355.
[7] ROBERTS G O, KORNFELD D M, FOWLIS W W. Particle orbits in a rotating liquid [J]. J Fluid Mech, 1991, 229(1): 555-567.
[8] ANNAMALAL P, SUBRAMANIAN B, COLE R. Bubble migration inside a liquid drop in a space laboratory [J]. Phys Fluids, 1982, 25(1): 1121-1126.
[9] BOWEN T J, ROWE A J. An introduction to ultracentrifugation[M]. Vol. 4. John Wiley & Sons, 1970.
[10] SHERWOOD J. The hydrodynamic forces on a cylinder touching a permeable wellbore [J]. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 1990, 2 (10): 1757–1759.
[11] ANNAMALAI P, SHANKAR N, COLE R, SUBRMANIAN R S. Bubble migration inside a liquid drop in a space laboratory [J]. Appl Sci Res, 1982, 38(1): 179-186.
[12] KUZNETSOV A. Nanofluid bioconvection: Interaction of microorganisms oxytactic up-swimming, nanoparticle distribution, and heating/cooling from below [J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2012, 26(1-4): 291-310.
[13] KUZNETSOV A V. Nanofluid bioconvection in water-based suspensions containing nanoparticles and oxytactic microorganisms: Oscillatory instability [J]. Nanoscale Research Letters, 2011, 6: 100. DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-100.
[14] LEE H G, KIM J. Numerical investigation of falling bacterial plumes caused by bioconvection in a three-dimensional chamber [J]. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2015, 52: 120-130.
[15] HILLESDON A, PEDLEY T. Bioconvection in suspensions of oxytactic bacteria: Linear theory [J]. J Fluid Mech, 1996, 324: 223-259.
[16] SAUID S M, KRISHNAN J, LING T H, VELURI M V P S. Enhancement of oxygen mass transfer and gas holdup using palm oil in stirred tank bioreactors with xanthan solutions as simulated viscous fermentation broths [J]. Bio Med Research International, 2013: 409675. DOI: 10.1155/2013/409675.
[17] KRAAKMAN N J R, ROCHA-RIOS J, van LOOSDRECHT M C M. Review of mass transfer aspects for biological gas treatment [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 91(4): 873-886.
[18] XU H, POP I. Fully developed mixed convection flow in a horizontal channel filled by a nanofluid containing both nanoparticles and gyrotactic microorganisms [J]. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2014, 46: 37-45.
[19] ALSAEDI A, KHAN M I, FAROOQ M, GULL N, HAYAT T. Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stratified bioconvective flow of nanofluid due to gyrotactic microorganisms [J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2017, 28(1): 288-298.
[20] KHAN W, MAKINDE O. MHD nanofluid bioconvection due to gyrotactic microorganisms over a convectively heat stretching sheet [J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2014, 81: 118-124.
[21] SIDDIQA S, BEGUM N, SALEEM S, HOSSAIN M, GORLA R S R. Numerical solutions of nanofluid bioconvection due to gyrotactic microorganisms along a vertical wavy cone [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 101: 608-613.
[22] KHAN W, UDDIN M J, ISMAIL A M. Free convection of non-Newtonian nanofluids in porous media with gyrotactic microorganisms [J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2013, 97(2): 241-252.
[23] IQBAL Z, MEHMOOD Z, MARAJ E. Oblique transport of gyrotactic microorganisms and bioconvection nanoparticles with convective mass ux [J]. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 2017, 88: 265-271.
[24] ABE T, NAKAMURA S, KUDO S. Bioconvection induced by bacterial chemotaxis in a capillary assay [J]. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2017, 483(1): 277-282.
[25] AVINASH K, SANDEEP N, MAKINDE O D, ANIMASAUN I L. Aligned magnetic field effect on radiative bioconvection flow past a vertical plate with thermophoresis and Brownian motion [J]. Defect and Diffusion Forum, 2017, 377: 127-140.
[26] KUMAR K G, RAMESH G, GIREESHA B, GORLA R. Characteristics of Joule heating and viscous dissipation on three-dimensional flow of Oldroyd B nanofluid with thermal radiation [J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2018, 57(3): 2139-2149.
[27] DANIEL Y S, AZIZ Z A, ISMAIL Z, SALAH F. Effects of thermal radiation, viscous and joule heating on electrical MHD nanofluid with double stratification [J]. Chinese Journal of Physics, 2017, 55 (3): 630-651.
[28] MOTSA S, MAGAGULA V, SIBANDA P. A bivariate chebyshev spectral collocation quasi-linearization method for nonlinear evolution parabolic equations [J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/581987.
[29] MOTSA S S, MUTUA S F, SHATEYI S. Solving nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations using multidomain bivariate spectral collocation method [C]// Nonlinear Systems-Design, Analysis, Estimation and Control. 2016.
[30] SURESH M, MANGLIK A. Mathematical analysis of Hall effect on transient Hartman flow about a rotating horizontal permeable surface in a porous medium under inclined magnetic field [R]. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014: 1-8.
[31] MOHAMED M, SALLEH M, NOAR N, ISHAK A. Buoyancy effect on stagnation point flow past a stretching vertical surface with Newtonian heating [C]// AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing, 2017: 020005-1-020005-8.
[32] KHAN W, MAKINDE O, KHAN Z. MHD boundary layer flow of a nanofluid containing gyrotactic microorganism past a vertical plate with Navier slip [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 74: 285-291.
[33] SHATEYI S, MOTSA S S, SIBANDA P. The effects of thermal radiation, Hall currents, Soret, and Dufour on MHD flow by mixed convection over a vertical surface in porous media [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2010: 627475. DOI: 10.1155/2010/627475.
[34] SALEM A M, EL-AZIZ M A. Effect of hall currents and chemical reaction on hydromagnetic flow of a stretching vertical surface with internal heat generation/absorption [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2008, 32(7): 1236-1254.
[35] NOREEN S, QASIM M. Influence of Hall current and viscous dissipation on pressure driven flow of pseudoplastic fluid with heat generation: A mathematical study [J]. PloS One, 2015, 10(6): e0129588.
[36] REDDY P S, SREEDEVI P, CHAMKHA A J. Heat and mass transfer flow of a nanofluid over an inclined plate under enhanced boundary conditions with magnetic field and thermal radiation [J]. Heat Transfer Asian Research, 2017, 46(7): 815-839.
[37] REDDY M G., KUMARI P V, PADMA P. Effect of thermal radiation on MHD Casson nanofluid over a cylinder [J]. Journal of Nanofluids, 2018, 7(3): 428-438.
[38] AWAD F G, AHAMED S M, SIBANDA P, KHUMALO M. The effect of thermophoresis on unsteady Bldroyd-B nanofluid flow over stretching surface [J]. PloS One, 2015, 10(8): e0135914.
[39] MAKINDE O, ANIMASAUN I. Thermophoresis and Brownian motion effects on MHD bioconvection of nanofluid with nonlinear thermal radiation and quartic chemical reaction past an upper horizontal surface of a paraboloid of revolution [J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2016, 221: 733-743.
[40] ZAIMI K, ISHAK A, POP I. Boundary layer flow and heat transfer over a nonlinearly permeable stretching/shrinking sheet in a nanofluid [J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4: 4404
[41] MAKINDE O, ANIMASAUN I. Bioconvection in MHD nanofluid flow with nonlinear thermal radiation and quartic autocatalysis chemical reaction past an upper surface of a paraboloid of revolution [J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2016, 109: 159-171
[42] CHAKRABORTY T, DAS K, KUNDU P K. Framing the impact of external magnetic field on bioconvection of a nanofluid flow containing gyrotactic microorganisms with convective boundary conditions [J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2016, 57: 61-71.
[43] SHAW S, KAMESWARAN P K, NARAYANA M, SIBANDA P. Biocinvevtion in a non-Darcyporus medium saturated with a nanofluid and oxytactic micro-organisms [J]. International Journal of Biomathematics, 2014, 7(1): 1450005.
(Edited by YANG Hua)
中文导读
二元谱拟线性化含嗜氧微生物旋转纳米流体的对流边界条件
摘要:在本研究中,考虑了旋转的含有嗜氧微生物的黏性、不可压缩的导电纳米流体和漂浮在流体中的绝缘板的三维流动动力学。研究考虑了三种情况:一种是流体拖动板,第二种是板拖动流体,第三种是板以与流体相同的速度漂浮在流体上。浓度较高的嗜氧微生物因流体中氧梯度的作用而上浮到顶部时会产生生物对流。速度比在这种流动的动力学中起关键作用。低于临界值或高于临界值时,改变参数会改变流动的动力学。改变速度比使其低于或高于临界值会改变流体流动的动力学,Hartmann数、浮力比和辐射参数对二次速度有反作用。另一方面,Hall参数对低于或高于临界值的速度比的初始速度有反作用。生物截面的Rayleigh数减慢了初始速度。当速度比低于0.5时,二次速度随着生物截面Rayleigh数的增大而加快。当速度比高于 0.5时,对于较小的生物截面Rayleigh数,二次速度起反作用,但随着数值的增加,对流动的作用发生被逆转,起正作用。
关键词:生物对流;嗜氧微生物;速度比;旋转纳米流体;二元光谱拟线性化
Received date: 2018-11-05; Accepted date: 2019-04-26
Corresponding author: Hiranmoy MONDAL, PhD, Associate Professor; Tel: +91-9434633158; E-mail: hiranmoymondal@yahoo.co.in; ORCID: 0000- 0002-9153-300X